Legal Opinion
Pace University v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 25, 2008No. 07-1032, 07-1054PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
The petition for review filed by Pace University seeks to have the court hold that the National Labor Relations Board abused its discretion in applying its nonrel-itigation rule. Under that rule the Board has determined that only in limited circumstances will a party be permitted to reopen a representation issue during an unfair labor practice proceeding. Pace maintains that it did not raise an issue regarding the scope of the bargaining unit during the representation proceeding because it thought it had prevailed on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Students Against Genocide v. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Kentucky River Community Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Magnesium Casting Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- UC Health v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Salem Hospital Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Matson Terminals, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- (PC) Ardds v. HicksDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Cortez v. Sacramento State Prison OfficerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.