Legal Opinion

State v. Hamblin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 6, 2008No. 2 CA-CR 2007-0166PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 A jury found appellant Lance Hamblin guilty of third-degree burglary and theft. In this opinion, we address Hamblin’s argument that his actions did not constitute burglary under A.R.S. § 13-1506. In a separate, simultaneously filed memorandum decision, we address other issues that do not meet the criteria for publication and conclude they, like the claim we resolve in this opinion, are without merit. See Ariz. R. Sup.Ct. 111(h); Ariz. R.Crim. P. 31.26.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 On appeal, “[w]e view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. MartinezArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. StroudArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. WorthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. State v. ZINSMEYERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. State of Arizona v. Joann BonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. State of Arizona v. Lee L.N.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API