Legal Opinion
Skelton & Co. v. Goldsmith
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 24, 1969No. 68 Civ. 1080PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
COOPER, District Judge.
Defendant moves for an order pursuant to Rule 37, F.R.Civ.P., directing plaintiff to give further answers to certain interrogatories served upon plaintiff as an adverse party pursuant to Rule 33, F.R.Civ.P.
I
Interrogatory Nos. 7, 8, 13(b) (2), 14(a-c), 15(c), 16(a, b), 17(b, c), 19(a, b), 20, 20(b), 21, 22(a, b), 23 and 24 of the First Set and Interrogatory No. 9(a-c) of the Second Set are alleged to have been inadequately answered for the reason that plaintiff has failed to meet its obligation of securing information available to it from sources under its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bohlin v. Brass Rail, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Greenbie v. NobleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Firemen's Mutual Insurance v. Erie-Lackawanna RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- National Transformer Corp. v. France Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
- Levatino Co. v. American President Lines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1974
- Trane Co. v. KlutznickDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1980
- Nissei America, Inc. v. Cincinnati Milacron, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982