Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PIERCE, District Judge.
This case is before the Court today for a decision on the question of whether sanctions should be imposed against plaintiff, Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, for failure to comply with orders to provide discovery to the defendants in this action.
Counsel have discussed the background of the ease and there is no need to relate it in detail. Briefly, however, the events leading up to this hearing are as follows:
The case was referred to Magistrate Sol Schreiber to act as the judicial officer supervising the discovery of the parties. As part of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- In re Professional Hockey Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Life Music, Inc. v. Broadcast Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Diversified Products Corp. v. Sports Center Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
- Budget Rent-A-Car of Missouri, Inc. v. Hertz Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Kozlowski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
- Flour Mills of America, Inc. v. PaceDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Martin v. Easton Publishing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.