National Transformer Corp. v. France Mfg. Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
This is an action for specific performance of a license agreement, for a declaratory *607judgment as to whether said license has been cancelled and for infringement of certain patents if the license has been cancelled.
Defendant has served interrogatories and supplemental interrogatories on plaintiffs. Plaintiffs object to Interrogatory No. 9 and defendant has filed a brief in opposition to plaintiffs’ objection. Defendant also has moved that plaintiffs be required to answer supplemental Interrogatory No. 5 as propounded.
Plaintiffs’ objection to Interrogatory No. 9 is based on…
2Cited by5 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Meese v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Baxter v. VickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Cordis Corp. v. SciMed Life Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Skelton & Co. v. GoldsmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969