Heney v. Sutro & Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
In this action the plaintiff sought damages for the alleged conversion of a bond. The case was ultimately tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was entered for the defendant, from which an appeal has been taken upon the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions. Alleged errors of law occurring during the trial, and the claimed insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings and the judgment are the only points urged in support of the appeal.
The facts of the case as developed upon the trial and upon which the findings of the court were based, are practically undisputed and are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vermilye & Co. v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Crouch v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Docter v. FurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. PressmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Bumgarner v. OrtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Commercial Security Co. v. Modesto Drug Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Appel v. MorfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.