Legal Opinion

Doyle v. American Loan Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 29, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). Under our Constitution and laws, all contracts for a greater rate of interest than ten per cent, per annum shall be void as to principal and interest, and the G-eneral Assembly shall prohibit the same by law. Constitution of 1874, article 19, § 13; Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 7362.

Counsel for the plaintiff seek to uphold the judgment under the well settled principle that where the promise to pay a sum above legal interest depends upon a contingency, or where for any cause the principal sum loaned is put in hazard, the loan is not usurious. Reeve v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. KrumseigSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Reeve v. Ladies' Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. McLachlanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Mathews v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Strickler v. State Auto Finance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Calimpco, Inc. v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Sosebee v. BoswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Wilson v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Luebbers v. Money Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API