Legal Opinion

Strickler v. State Auto Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 19, 1952No. 4-9791PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Minor W. Millwee, Justice.

This is a suit by appellant, Mrs. Love Strickler, to cancel, on the ground of usury, a note and chattel mortgage which she executed in connection with a loan from appellee, State Auto Finance Company. The complaint charged that, in making the loan, appellee required the purchase of unnecessary and excessive insurance and that service fees charged or deducted from the loan were either altogether fictitious or exorbitant for any services actually rendered and that such charges were made for the sole purpose of concealing the real intent to charge a usurious and illegal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Winston v. Personal Finance Co. of Pine Bluff, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Koen v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. National Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. MahaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Family Loan Co. of Nashville v. HickersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. First National Bank in Mena, Cross-Appellee v. Jack A. Nowlin, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Winston v. Personal Finance Co. of Pine Bluff, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API