Legal Opinion

Bennion v. Utah State Board of Oil, Gas & Mining

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1983No. 18345PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This is a ease of first impression on the rights of a nonconsenting mineral owner under the pooling provisions of the Oil & Gas Conservation Act, U.C.A., 1953, § 40-6-1, et seq. After extensive hearings, the Board of Oil, Gas and Mining (“the Board”) ruled for the operator, Shell Oil Co. The mineral owner, Bennion, challenged that order in an action or appeal (the authorizing statute uses both terms, § 40-6-10) in the district court. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court affirmed the Board’s order, and the mineral owner pursued this appeal. The issues all…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Brown v. SpilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Davis County v. Clearfield CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment v. Executive Director of the Utah Department of Environmental QualityUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Kline Ex Rel. Kline v. Utah Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Bennion v. ANR Production Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API