Legal Opinion

Bennion v. ANR Production Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1991No. 900473PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

This is a case of first impression on the rights of a nonconsenting mineral owner under the forced pooling provisions of the Utah Oil and Gas Conservation Act. The case raises questions regarding the drilling of increased density wells in a drilling unit already subject to a forced pooling order. The operative facts span nearly two decades, from 1971 to 1990. During that period, the Oil and Gas Conservation Act underwent several amendments and a complete repeal and reenactment. We discuss the effect of those changes on the parties’ rights and liabilities, and we examine…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rio Algom Corp. v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Utah Division of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Richards v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Smith Investment Co. v. Sandy CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API