Bennion v. ANR Production Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
This is a case of first impression on the rights of a nonconsenting mineral owner under the forced pooling provisions of the Utah Oil and Gas Conservation Act. The case raises questions regarding the drilling of increased density wells in a drilling unit already subject to a forced pooling order. The operative facts span nearly two decades, from 1971 to 1990. During that period, the Oil and Gas Conservation Act underwent several amendments and a complete repeal and reenactment. We discuss the effect of those changes on the parties’ rights and liabilities, and we examine…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Rio Algom Corp. v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Utah Division of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Richards v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Smith Investment Co. v. Sandy CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.