Legal Opinion
Rypkema v. Time Manufacturing Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 20, 2003No. 01 Civ. 4534(RWS)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Time Manufacturing Company (“Time”) has moved under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Rose Rypkema and Ted Rypkema (“Rypkema”) (collectively, the “Rypke-mas”) alleging product liability. Third-party defendant Savvy Systems, Ltd. (“Savvy”) has cross-moved to dismiss the third-party complaint of Time. For the reasons set forth below, the motion of Time is granted.
Prior Proceedings
The complaint in this action was filed on April 16, 2001, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, and removed to this Court…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Martin T. Kosmynka and Christine Kosmynka v. Polaris Industries, Inc., Docket No. 05-3958-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Hilaire v. DeWalt Industrial Tool Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Dreyer v. Ryder Automotive Carrier Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Colon Ex Rel. Stolyar v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Maxwell v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.