Legal Opinion
Traverso v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 26, 2002No. Nos. 01-16597, 01-16605; D.C. No. CV-00-01921-SIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Richard Traverso, dba Adco Outdoor Advertising, appeals from the dismissal of his action against Clear Channel Communications, Inc. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We affirm.(1) We agree with the district court that Traverso has not properly pled that there was an actual or de facto merger of Eller Media Corporation (EMC) into Clear Channel, or a consolidation of EMC and Clear Channel. See Franklin v. USX Corp., 87 Cal.App.4th 615, 625-627, 105 Cal.Rptr.2d 11, 17-19 (2001); Phillips v. Cooper Labs., Inc., 215 Cal.App.3d 1648, 1658-59, 264 Cal.Rptr. 311, 316-17 (1989); Marks v. Minn.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corporation, United States Ex Rel. Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BHC Interim Funding, L.P. v. Finantra Capital, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003