Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Brown

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1997No. Civil Action No. 96-5258Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT F. KELLY, District Judge.

This action involves a determination of whether Third-Party Defendant Pennland Insurance Company (“Pennland”) is required to provide insurance coverage arising out of a motor vehicle accident between Anna and James Thomas (“Plaintiffs”), and Michael J. Brown (“Brown”). Pennland has filed a motion for summary judgment which is presently before the Court. Plaintiffs and Brown agree that there are no genuine issues of material fact and have filed a joint cross-motion for summary judgment. For the rea*958sons that follow, Plaintiffs’ Motion will be denied and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API