Thomas v. Brown
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERT F. KELLY, District Judge.
This action involves a determination of whether Third-Party Defendant Pennland Insurance Company (“Pennland”) is required to provide insurance coverage arising out of a motor vehicle accident between Anna and James Thomas (“Plaintiffs”), and Michael J. Brown (“Brown”). Pennland has filed a motion for summary judgment which is presently before the Court. Plaintiffs and Brown agree that there are no genuine issues of material fact and have filed a joint cross-motion for summary judgment. For the rea*958sons that follow, Plaintiffs’ Motion will be denied and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.