Legal Opinion
Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 20, 2006No. Civil Action 05-12237-WGYPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) commenced this action against F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd., Roche Diagnostics GmbH, & Hoffman-La-Roche, Inc. (collectively “Roche/Hoffman”) seeking a declaratory judgment that Roche/Hoffman currently infringes or will infringe Amgen’s patents for erythropoiet-in (“EPO”). Am. Compl. ¶ 26 [Doc. No. 52], The patents at issue are U.S. Patent Nos. 5,441,868 (the “'868 patent”), 5,547,-933 (the “'933 patent”), 5,618,698 (the “'698 patent”), 5,621,080 (the “'080 patent”), 5,756,349 (the “'349 patent”), and 5,955,422 (the “'422…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Bushnell, Inc. v. Brunton Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
- Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Shionogi, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- AIG Property Casualty Co. v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Allele Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.