Legal Opinion

McNeal v. Black

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1983No. 8226SC350PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRASWELL, Judge.

Black argues in his brief that the court erred in refusing to grant his motion for a jury trial and his motion to have NASD’s Rules of Fair Practice and Code of Arbitration Procedure declared unconstitutional. Black contends that he was compelled to submit to arbitration since he was subject to disciplinary action had he refused to arbitrate. He urges this Court to regard the arbitration agreement as coercive, compelling him to choose arbitration rather than risk termination of his employment and the loss of his license.

We do not agree with Black that his submission to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carolina Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Thomas v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. RESORT DEVELOPMENT CO. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nucor Corp. v. General Bearing Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. G. L. Wilson Building Co. v. Thorneburg Hosiery Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Carteret County v. United Contractors of Kinston, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Jaffe v. NoceraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Anderson v. ElliottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API