Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Howard
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided April 7, 1981No. 8020DC626PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge. '
Defendant’s brief does not comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure in several respects. It does not contain a statement of the questions presented for review. App. R. 28(b)(1). In addition, it does not include a short, nonargumentative summary of the essential facts. App. R. 28(b)(2). Finally, the brief makes no reference to the assignment of error or exception in the record which is pertinent to defendant’s argument on appeal. App. R. 28(b)(3). In our discretion, we shall, nevertheless, address the merits of the case.
Defendant seeks reversal of the order confirming the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carolina Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Firemen's Fund Ins. v. Flint Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Carolina-Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Young v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Pearson v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cyclone Roofing Co. v. David M. LaFave Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Rodgers Builders, Inc. v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Nucor Corp. v. General Bearing Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Blow v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- G. L. Wilson Building Co. v. Thorneburg Hosiery Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.