G. L. Wilson Building Co. v. Thorneburg Hosiery Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Appellant Thorneburg contends the trial court erred in confirming the arbitration award and denying its motions to vacate, modify, correct or remand the award. Thorneburg argues in support of this contention that the arbitrators exceeded their author ity in awarding Wilson $656,050.93, because this sum must include amounts for items which are not subject to arbitration.
The purpose of arbitration is to reach a final settlement of disputed matters without litigation, and the parties, who have agreed to abide by the decision of the arbitrators, will not generally be heard to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Crutchley v. CrutchleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Crutchley v. CrutchleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Thomas v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- McNeal v. BlackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- D & E Construction Co. v. Robert J. Denley Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Smith v. YOUNG MOVING AND STORAGE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- North Carolina Industrial Capital, LLC v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Birkey Design Group, Inc. v. Egle Nursing Home, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Faison & Gillespie v. LorantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.