Legal Opinion
State v. Richard
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 25, 1990No. 16333, 16814PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Following jury trial, appellant was convicted of two counts of selling controlled substances, Count One, marijuana, and Count Two, amphetamines. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of five and ten years’ imprisonment. Following that conviction, he filed a Rule 29.15 motion. It was denied after an evidentiary hearing. Appellant’s appeal from his criminal convictions and the appeal from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion have been consolidated here. Rule 29.15(Z). Appellant presents three points for our review.
Appellant’s first point, the only one related to his direct appeal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marion Francis Fountain and Roosevelt Tremble v. United States of America, Eugene J. Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Luis Carbone, A/K/A "Luiggi,"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- David ENGEBRETSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Hartford Insurance Company, Intervening Plaintiff, v. FAIRCHILD AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- White River Development Co. v. Meco Systems, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. BigsbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. ArndtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.