Legal Opinion
State v. Bigsby
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 1995No. 19324PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Judge.
Baker E. Bigsby (defendant) appeals a conviction of trafficking drugs in the second degree. § 195.223.7, RSMo Supp.1989. Defendant contends his conviction should be reversed because evidence used at trial was obtained by means of an illegal search; because the state destroyed evidence that would have been exculpatory and corroborative of his defense; and because the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to prove the offense charged. This court affirms.
Defendant was tried by the court without a jury. When a defendant waives trial by jury, the trial court’s findings have the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peters v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. PolsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. LoveMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. McMeansMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hlavacek v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.