Legal Opinion

White River Development Co. v. Meco Systems, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1991No. 16835PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiff sought damages against defendant Meco Systems, Inc. (Meco) and defendant Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (Fidelity). Plaintiff’s claim was based on breach of a construction contract which it had with Meco to construct condominium residential buildings consisting of two four-plexes and two eight-plexes on the same tract. Fidelity was the surety on a performance bond and a “Labor and Material Payment Bond” provided by Meco on the project.

Meco filed a counterclaim, seeking additional sums which it claims were due it under the contract and change orders amending…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Forsythe v. StarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. BCI Corp. v. Charlebois Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. In Re Marriage of RunezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Robinson v. Estate of RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Looney v. Estate of EshlemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Jerry Bennett Masonry, Inc. v. Crossland Const. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. MECO Systems, Inc. v. Dancing Bear Entertainment, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. 808 DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. MurakamiHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. McMickle v. McMickleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API