Martin v. Porter
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This is an action of claim and delivery. The complaint alleges that on the tenth day of October, 1888, the defendant, Howard B. Porter, filed in court his petition in insolvency, and thereafter such proceedings were had that plaintiff was duly appointed his assignee, and qualified as such, and thereupon the clerk of the court duly assigned to him all the estate, real and personal, of the insolvent debtor; “that at the time of filing said petition said defendant was, and long prior thereto had been, and still is, the owner and in possession of a certain quantity of hay, to wit,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Botto v. VandamentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- King v. FeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Goodday v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cuneo v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Gahagan v. GuglerMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Casci v. OzalliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Bellingham Bay Lumber Co. v. Western Amusement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Fornaris Roig v. FontSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.