Legal Opinion

Casci v. Ozalli

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1910No. Sac. No. 1829PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In the court below, upon motion of the plaintiff, judgment was entered upon the pleadings in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, with respect to the mining claim designated as the Gold Ridge Gravel Mine. Defendants appeal from this part of the judgment. The complaint asserted title to another mining claim known as the Gold Ridge Extension Gravel Mine, but plaintiff afterwards disclaimed any interest therein and judgment was given in favor of the defendants with respect to that mine. As to that part of the judgment no controversy arises, the appeal being solely from the other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Nudd v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Botto v. VandamentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Norris v. LillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuneo v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Earl v. TylerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Barnes v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API