Legal Opinion

Jamison v. Kamerer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1933No. Appeal, 132PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

In this action of trespass for negligence, plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment, from the latter of which defendant appeals. His principal complaints are that the court below erred in not ruling, as a matter of law, that he was not negligent, and that plaintiff was contributorily negligent. In determining whether or not these complaints are well founded, we must give to plaintiff the benefit of every fact and reasonable inference of fact, favoring his contention, which the jury might properly have found from the evidence; and must reject every alleged fact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zandras v. MoffettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Frank v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Vendig v. Union League of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Thomas v. Geo. W. Boyd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. MARTIN v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Shakley v. LeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Leasure v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Broad v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Miller v. Southern Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API