Endodontic Associates of Lexington, Inc. v. Johnston-Neeser
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
MacLeod-Mancuso, Bonnie H., J.
The plaintiff and defendant in counterclaim, Endodontic Associates of Lexington, Inc. (“EAL”) brought claims against the defendants, plaintiffs in counterclaim and third-party plaintiffs, Joyce C. Johnston-Neeser (“Dr. Neeser”), Kelly Barnes (“Dr. Barnes”), and Sudbury Endodontics, P.C. (“SE”) (collectively the “plaintiffs in counterclaim”), alleging that the plaintiffs in counterclaim had violated non-compete agreements and taken EAL property. Subsequently, the plaintiffs in counterclaim brought counterclaims against EAL, including: Counts I and II: Breach of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Byrnes v. LukesMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009
- Haney v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2012