Legal Opinion

Endodontic Associates of Lexington, Inc. v. Johnston-Neeser

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 16, 2006No. 053319PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLeod-Mancuso, Bonnie H., J.

The plaintiff and defendant in counterclaim, Endodontic Associates of Lexington, Inc. (“EAL”) brought claims against the defendants, plaintiffs in counterclaim and third-party plaintiffs, Joyce C. Johnston-Neeser (“Dr. Neeser”), Kelly Barnes (“Dr. Barnes”), and Sudbury Endodontics, P.C. (“SE”) (collectively the “plaintiffs in counterclaim”), alleging that the plaintiffs in counterclaim had violated non-compete agreements and taken EAL property. Subsequently, the plaintiffs in counterclaim brought counterclaims against EAL, including: Counts I and II: Breach of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Byrnes v. LukesMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009
  2. Haney v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API