Legal Opinion

Rinaudo v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this action seeking damages for illegal entry and conversion of personal property, the court erred insofar as it awarded plaintiff attorneys’ fees. "Under the general rule, attorneys’ fees and disbursements are incidents of litigation and the prevailing party may not collect them from the loser unless an award is authorized by agreement between the parties or by statute or court rule” (Matter of A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 NY2d 1, 5; Matter of Birnbaum…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. LezakNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. United Pickle Co. v. OmanoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Brook Shopping Centers, Inc. v. BassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Stanley Depo & Sons, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Birnbaum v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Palermo v. TacconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Anniszkiewicz v. HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API