Birnbaum v. Birnbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this proceeding brought by respondent Saul Birnbaum seeking disqualification of petitioner’s attorneys, the court erred insofar as it awarded attorneys’ fees and expenses to those parties opposing the motion. A court has no inherent authority to impose attorneys’ fees or other monetary sanctions as a penalty for frivolous litigation. "Under the general rule, attorneys’ fees and disbursements are incidents of litigation and the prevailing party may not collect them…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. LezakNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ltown Ltd. Partnership v. Sire Plan, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Estate of O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Rinaudo v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989