Stanley Depo & Sons, Inc. v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Award and findings unanimously affirmed, without costs, and judgment entered thereon vacated. Memorandum: Claimants initially contend, in these consolidated actions, that the trial court should have found that the before taking highest and best use of the westerly parcel, except that portion zoned residential, was as an industrial park. While the court did conclude that the best use of a portion of that tract was as an industrial park, the remainder was valued as raw acreage with a potential for industrial development. We first note that the record provides a basis for the assignment of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- In re County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Triple Cities Shopping Center, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Cronk v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
- Oriskany Development Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Rinaudo v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Depo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.