Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Layman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1953No. 32244PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

This is an action for trespass. Defendants have appealed from a judgment against them, entered upon the verdict of a jury.

The allegations of plaintiffs’ complaint which we need relate are that, on and subsequent to July 15, 1951, defendants entered upon plaintiffs’ land and, without lawful authority, cut and removed and converted to their own use, certain timber, to plaintiffs’ damage.

Defendants answered by admitting that they cut some timber from a portion of the land, and denying the other allegations of the complaint.

At proper times, defendants demurred to plaintiffs’ evidence, and moved…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Bank of Wilbur v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. King County v. Hanson Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Elmonte Investment Co. v. Schafer Bros. Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Schnitzer v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Olympic Manganese Mining Co. v. DowningWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wasser & Winters Co. v. Jefferson CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hoglund v. Omak Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  3. Carr v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Layman v. LedgettWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Comfort & Fleming Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. HoxseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API