Layman v. Ledgett
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
This appeal concerns the nature and effect of a timber deed conveying cutting rights for a period of years. The question raised is to whom the uncut timber belongs after the expiration of the specified period when, prior to the expiration, the grantor failed to pay real property taxes on the land and the county foreclosed on "land only." During this time the grantee of the cutting rights paid taxes on his interest as required by law. The Court of Appeals held that upon expiration of the cutting rights period the uncut timber belonged to the current owner of the fee, purchaser from the county.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Elmonte Investment Co. v. Schafer Bros. Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
- Hendrickson v. LyonsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Wasser & Winters Co. v. Jefferson CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- France v. Deep River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- M. & I. TIMBER CO. v. Hope Silver-Lead Mines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoglund v. Omak Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- In Re Property Located at 14255 53rd Ave. S., TukwilaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Malbrain v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports1996
- Layman v. LedgettWashington Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.