Legal Opinion

Hale v. Electric Steel Foundry Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. Plaintiff was employed as a laborer by defendant from about January 20, 1945 to and including March 12, 1945. On March 12, 1945, beginning at 5 A.M., plaintiff was working as a helper in loading one of defendant's electric furnaces and about noon of the last named date, while attempting to prevent a piece of metal weighing approximately 100 pounds from falling off of the part of the loading device, known as a spoon, on to plaintiff's foot, plaintiff sustained the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Fehely v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Freeman v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Rowe v. RoweOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Yovovich v. Falls City Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Feist v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Klerk v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Williams v. Clemen's Forest Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. O'NEAL v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Norman v. Cunningham Sheep Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API