Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1932PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The defendant’s plant, in which it conducted the business of selling and repairing motor trucks, occupied a two-story building 200 by 200 feet in dimensions. The plaintiff had been employed in the service department of that plant for six years as an expert in the repair of that portion of automobile trucks known as the transmission. Referring to this part of trucks he testified upon direct examination: “I was assigned as a specialist to do this particular kind of work,” and added that during his six years’ employment with the defendant he had repaired about 5,000 transmissions. November 15,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Bottig v. PolskyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Roth v. Northern Pacific Lumbering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Bino v. VeenhuizenWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Dorn v. Clarke-Woodward Drug Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Clark v. STRAINOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brooks v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Powell v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hoffman v. Broadway HazelwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Skeeters v. SkeetersOregon Supreme Court · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API