Legal Opinion

Fehely v. Senders

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1943PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries growing out of an automobile accident. There were three automobiles involved— one driven by the plaintiff Lu Elda Fehely; another driven by the defendant William R. Senders, allegedly on behalf of the defendant Lang, Senders & Co.; and the third driven by John J. Foy, allegedly on behalf of the defendant Consolidated Supply Company. On the trial the court granted a judgment of involuntary non-suit in favor of the defendant Lang, Senders & Co., and submitted the case to the jury as to the other two defendants. The jury, by its…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Erie Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. McDermott v. SevereSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Philibert v. KluserOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Valence v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hansen v. BussmanOregon Supreme Court · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API