Legal Opinion

Galvis v. Petito

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1993No. B061157PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Gregory Galvis (Galvis), Angelica Lopez (Lopez), and Maria Torres (Torres) (collectively, plaintiffs) appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Orlando Petito (Petito) based on the grant of the latter’s motion for summary judgment.

Because we conclude Petito is liable to plaintiffs under Vehicle Code section 17150 1 as the owner of a vehicle which was negligently operated by a permissive user who himself was immune from liability pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (WC Act), we reverse the judgment.

Summary Statement

Under…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Srithong v. Total Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Defoe v. PhillipSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  3. Castro v. Budget Rent-A-Car System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Chapman v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Tavares v. Zipcar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API