Legal Opinion

Srithong v. Total Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1994No. B063357PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiff and appellant Pavarud Srithong (Srithong) appeals a judgment holding defendants and respondents Total Investment Company and Michael and Bok Kwon (collectively, Total) not jointly and severally liable with a codefendant for Srithong’s noneconomic damages.

In this case of first impression, the issue presented is whether Civil Code section 1431 et seq., commonly known as Proposition 51, which abrogated joint and several liability for noneconomic damages, applies where a defendant’s liability is based on a nondelegable duty.

Because the nondelegable duty doctrine is a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Far West Financial Corp. v. D & S CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Wimberly v. Derby Cycle Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Diaz v. CarcamoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Wiggs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API