Legal Opinion

State v. Warf

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 25, 1972No. 7211SC585PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant’s assignments of error all question the admissibility into evidence, over defendant’s objection, of the results of a breathalyzer test given to defendant when there was no evidence presented by the State that (1) the test was administered according to methods approved by the State Board of Health and that (2) the test was administered by a person possessing a valid permit issued by the State Board of Health for that purpose, as required by G.S. 20-139.1 (b). The assignments of error are well taken.

The decisions of this court in State v. Caviness, 7 N.C. App. 541, 173…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. CavinessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API