Legal Opinion

State v. Gray

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1976No. 7527SC770PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

• Defendant contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of the breathalyzer test over his objection in view of the State’s failure to establish as a foundational-requirement that the test, as performed, met the operational standards prescribed by statute. We agree. The failure of the State to produce evidence of the test operator’s compliance with G.S. 20-139.1 (b) must be deemed prejudicial error.

During the course of the trial, W. P. Thomas, a qualified operator of the breathalyzer machine, testified on voir dire that he administered the test to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WarfCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. State v. DrdakCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API