Legal Opinion

State v. Chavis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1972No. 726SC227PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

In assignment of error 13, defendant contends the court erred in overruling his objection to and subsequent motion to strike testimony that a breathalyzer test was administered and that the reading was .15 percent. This assignment of error is well taken. G.S. 20-139.1 (b) in pertinent part reads: “Chemical analyses of the person’s breath or blood, to be considered valid under the provisions of this section, shall have been performed according to methods approved by the State Board of Health and by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by the State Board of Health for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. MobleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. CavinessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WarfCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API