Legal Opinion

Ai v. Frank Huff Agency, Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1980No. 7039PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, CIRCUIT JUDGE

This is an interlocutory appeal by defendant-appellant, Frank Huff Agency, Ltd., from the order of the circuit court granting partial summary judgment for plaintiffs-appellees, Vernon Ai and Sandra Fukuhara. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

On August 2, 1974, plaintiffs executed and delivered to defendant, a collection agency, a promissory note payable in the amount of $2,061.76. The promissory note, which was prepared by defendant collection agency, was given in satisfaction of a default judgment earlier…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Barry G. Lew, M.D. v. Kona HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Yokoyama v. Midland National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API