Legal Opinion
Yokoyama v. Midland National Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 8, 2010No. 07-16825PublishedCited by 145 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 28, 2009, is hereby withdrawn. The petition for rehearing is denied. An opinion is being filed concurrently with this order.
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Midland National Life Insurance Company marketed annuities to senior citizens in Hawaii. At issue in this case are Midland annuities that were sold by independent brokers between 2001 and 2005. Plaintiff Gary Yokoyama purchased one of those annuities through an independent broker and filed this class action claiming that Midland marketed the annuities through deceptive practices,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Smilow v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Jesus Leyva v. Medlin Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-Op v. Bumble Bee Foods LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Roach v. T.L. Cannon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Stearns v. Ticketmaster Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Sali ex rel. Themselves v. Corona Reg'l Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.