Legal Opinion

Banta v. Wise

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1901No. S.F. No. 1929PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This is a suit for an accounting, the plaintiff alleging a balance in his favor of about four thousand dollars. This, with other allegations, is denied by the defendants, who claim, in their answer, a balance in their favor of $3,135.20. There is also a cross-complaint, which sets up a deed of the plaintiff and wife to the defendant Wise, of date March 22, 1894, purporting to convey to the grantee the land described, but claimed by the defendants to be a mortgage given to secure indebtedness to Christy & Wise, and contemplated advances. Judgment was rendered in favor of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Grant v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Felton v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Campbell v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. CerfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Schriber v. Alameda County-East Bay Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Windt v. CovertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Brown v. ComonowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API