Legal Opinion

Berg v. General Motors Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1976No. 43881PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This appeal involves the single issue of whether the law of negligence permits recovery by a purchaser of goods against a manufacturer for damages constituting solely economic loss as distinguished from damage to person or property.

Appellant is a commercial fisherman. In 1970 he purchased from Duncan Engine Company (Duncan) a new Detroit Diesel (made by General Motors Corporation, Detroit Diesel Division (General Motors)) for his new boat. The engine was listed as an 8V-53N and came fitted from the factory with what is called an MG-506 clutch. The clutch, according to the manufacturer, was…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API