Legal Opinion

Wells v. Oldsmobile Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1934PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

In their second amended complaint, plaintiffs allege that on or about the 26th day of March, 1930, defendant sold plaintiffs a certain automobile “expressly representing and warranting to the plaintiffs, at the time when the contract of sale was made, that said automobile was a new demonstrator”.

Plaintiffs also allege that they are husband and wife and as such constitute a family; that they purchased said automobile for family use, and in doing so “believed and relied upon all representations and warrants of defendant”.

It is further alleged that, unknown to plaintiffs, the automobile…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Rittenhouse, Winterson Auto. Co. v. KissnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  3. Patterson v. HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Gary Coast Agency, Inc. v. LawreyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Mobile Auto Co. v. SturgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Berg v. General Motors Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Redfield v. Mead, Johnson & CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Western Feed Co. v. HeidloffOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Williams v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API