Legal Opinion

Nigrelli v. Cody

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 5, 1980No. 345PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

The appellant, Richard F. Cody, on April 25,1958 executed a $10,000 note with a confession of judgment clause, due one year after date, to appellee Ernest J. Nigrelli. In 1977 Nigrelli filed a complaint in confession of judgment, and obtained a judgment for $21,700, including the $10,000 face amount and $11,700 interest. Cody petitioned the court to open or strike the confessed judgment, alleging several defenses. The court below issued a rule on Nigrelli to show cause why the judgment should not be opened or stricken.

Cody took Nigrelli’s deposition in order to provide evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Instapak Corp. v. S. Weisbrod Lamp & Shade Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Maurice Goldstein Co., Inc. v. MargolinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Zinck v. Smashy's Auto Salvage, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. GlendeningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Mims v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gerace v. Holmes Protection of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Alford v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Travitzky v. TravitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. BladySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Rushford v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API