Legal Opinion

Maurice Goldstein Co., Inc. v. Margolin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1977No. 59PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition to open a default judgment. Because the order was entered prematurely, we remand for further proceedings.

On December 1, 1972, appellee filed a complaint in assumpsit against appellant. The complaint was served on the manager of the apartment house where appellant lived, in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. 1009(b)(2)(ii). No answer having been filed, appellee took a default judgment on February 23, 1973. From November 26, 1973, through April, 1975, appellee undertook to execute on the judgment; 1 incident to this, on or about April 12,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Instapak Corp. v. S. Weisbrod Lamp & Shade Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Campbell v. Heilman Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Shainline v. Alberti Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Provident Credit Corp. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Alford v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Romeo v. LooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Duffy v. GerstSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API