Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Blady

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1982No. 1755PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

In a jury trial, defendant was convicted of arson-endangering property, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3301(b)(1), risking catastrophe, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3302(b), and criminal mischief, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3304(a)(1). Post-verdict motions were filed and denied, and judgment of sentence entered. In this appeal from that *84judgment of sentence,1 we reverse and grant a new trial, because we agree with defendant’s contention that the court below erred in admitting testimony concerning an arson defendant committed in New Jersey in 1965 as substantive proof of the crimes charged in this trial.2

The charges in this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. United States v. Martha L. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. WeakleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Armbruster v. HorowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Armbruster v. HorowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API