Legal Opinion

Gerace v. Holmes Protection of Phila.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 4, 1986No. 083PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This is an appeal from an Order of the lower court granting summary judgment in favor of appellee/defendant Holmes Protection, Inc. and against appellant/plaintiffs Nicholas Ferro and Essex Ring Corporation.

In August of 1969, plaintiffs William Gerace and Gerace Jewelers, Inc., entered into a contract with appellee Holmes Protection, Inc., which provided for the installation and maintenance of a burglar alarm system at the Gerace Jewelry Store. The alarm system had been manufactured by defendant Walter Kidde Company. The contract contains, inter alia, a limitation of liability…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. City of Philadelphia v. KennyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Scarpitti v. WeborgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Myszkowski v. Penn Stroud Hotel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. ToanoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Strutz v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Fennell v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API