Legal Opinion
Spencer v. Steel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 10, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
23 N.J. Super. 504 (1952)
93 A.2d 225
THOMAS J. SPENCER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIS D. STEEL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 24, 1952.
Decided December 10, 1952.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW, and JAYNE.
Mr. Carl Kisselman argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Ambrose J. Hinnegan, attorney; Mr. William C. Gotschalk, of counsel).
Mr. C. Zachary Seltzer argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Daniel Lichtenthal, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.
The present appeal calls our attention to the discretionary propriety of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Wilford v. Sigmund Eisner Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Chirelstein v. ChirelsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christiansen v. ChristiansenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Bowman v. BambaraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Whiteman Food Prod. Co. v. G. ARRIGONI & C., ETC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- DeCOSMO v. ForemanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961