Legal Opinion

DeCOSMO v. Foreman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 22, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

67 N.J. Super. 548 (1961)

171 A.2d 105

EMILY DeCOSMO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

CORNELIUS FOREMAN AND ELLEN B. FOREMAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 15, 1961.

Decided May 22, 1961.

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.

Mr. Richard S. Semel argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Laurence Semel, attorney).

Mr. Howard G. Stackhouse argued the cause for the respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.

This action was instituted in the name of the secretary of the attorney for plaintiff, upon a promissory note assigned to her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paxton v. MisiukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Bd. of Ed., Woodbridge Tp. v. Kane Acoustical Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. New Jersey Mortgage & Investment Co. v. DorseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Ertag v. HainesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Spencer v. SteelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M. v. K.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. M. v. F.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. M. v. K.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API