Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Bambara
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 28, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
28 N.J. Super. 92 (1953)
100 A.2d 357
PAUL E. BOWMAN, DOING BUSINESS AS BOWMAN ENGINEERING CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
A. JOHN BAMBARA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. PAUL E. BOWMAN, TRADING AS BOWMAN ENGINEERING CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
AMERICAN CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 28, 1953.
Decided October 28, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Victor R. King argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.
Mr. George Pellettieri argued the cause for the defendant-respondent A. John…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. BunkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Wilford v. Sigmund Eisner Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- State v. ThenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clarkson v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Hodgson v. ApplegateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Ballurio v. CampanaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Nemeth v. Otis Elevator Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- CHEEL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. LubbenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.