Legal Opinion

Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 10, 1951PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

15 N.J. Super. 139 (1951)

83 A.2d 246

MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,

v.

THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND TELDISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided August 10, 1951.

Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman (Mr. Meyer E. Ruback and Mr. Joseph A. Weisman) and Mr. Alfred C. Clapp, for the plaintiff.

Mr. Thomas J. Brogan, for the defendant Thor Corporation.

Mr. Richard J. Fitz Maurice, for the defendant Teldisco, Inc.

FRANCIS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

Plaintiff, Mayflower Industries, has moved for…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Brennan v. United Hatters of North America, Local No. 17Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  3. Louis Schlesinger Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Steiner v. SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  5. Ash v. CohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. LoBiondo v. SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  3. Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Muller Fuel Oil Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Amer.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Brunson v. Affinity Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API